Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
"If 18 is barely legal, then 17 is just barely illegal." — Robbie (mentioned)
"The younger under-aid shit is a little bit foul. Yeah. Yeah. But it looked like every time it was said that that person was under-aged so far. Yeah. He did it. Yeah." — Speaker (unidentified)
"If we going to get motherfuckers out of here from being a pedophile, they got to be a pedophile. And as far as I'm concerned, pedophiles, when you tell them you're underage, don't drop the combo. That's when a combo begins." — Speaker (unidentified)
This segment of the podcast delves into recent accusations against a public figure, focusing on the presentation of evidence, termed "receipts," to counter allegations. The speakers meticulously dissect the presented information, attempting to differentiate between questionable personal choices, such as an attraction to individuals at the cusp of legal age, and actual illegal actions. They emphasize the legal distinction between "barely legal" and "illegal," with one speaker quoting Robbie as saying, "If 18 is barely legal, then 17 is just barely illegal." The conversation highlights the importance of not applying extreme labels without irrefutable proof, likening the situation to a specific dietary restriction where one seeks alternatives rather than crossing prohibited lines.
The discussion then explores the concept of "grooming" and its application in this context. The speakers analyze whether the accused individual's actions, particularly stopping communication upon learning of a person's underage status and then ceasing contact even when they reach legal age, align with grooming behaviors. They present the argument that if the individual disengages upon discovering someone is underage, and does not re-engage when they become legal, it deviates from typical grooming patterns. The overall sentiment is to avoid making definitive judgments without sufficient evidence, while acknowledging that certain behaviors, even if not illegal, can be viewed as ethically questionable.
Ultimately, the speakers conclude that based on the available information, they cannot definitively state that the individual knowingly engaged in illegal sexual intercourse with underage girls. However, they do acknowledge significant proof of "shitty things" done to women, though they clarify that such actions, while distasteful, are not currently illegal. The segment ends with a brief mention of the Patreon subscription drive, encouraging listeners to join for more exclusive content.