Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
"But if you're the type of person to revel in someone getting cancelled for some like they said 10 years ago, you're just ensuring that one day you'll be cancelled for some like you said today. You can't predict what will be offensive in the future. You don't know who the dominant mob will be." — Mark
"If you want to live in a world where people are no longer saying these words, if they're not saying them, they said them 10 years but they're not saying them, then you have to let them evolve. Yeah, they have evolved with the times. It's just what you want them to do. What world do you want to live in? Yes." — Andrew
"The interesting thing about Destin, like the way he positions it is that he's not saying the things. Yeah. He's basically having the online discussion in real time. Yeah. So he's like positioning the groups against each other as if they're having that discussion. And it's kind of cool because it absolves him of any of the guilt." — Alex
The podcast episode features a freewheeling discussion among the hosts, primarily centered on the complexities of modern social discourse, particularly concerning humor and past statements. They explore the concept of "cancel culture," debating whether individuals should be held perpetually accountable for past remarks or if there should be room for personal evolution and forgiveness. The conversation touches upon sensitive topics, including transgender issues and religious beliefs, often using provocative language and humor to frame their points.
A significant portion of the discussion revolves around the idea that societal norms and what is considered offensive are constantly shifting. The hosts ponder how this impacts individuals, the media, and public figures, with arguments presented for both strict accountability and the allowance for growth. They analyze how public figures navigate these challenges and the potential consequences of both rigid adherence to past actions and the capacity for change.
The dialogue also delves into the nature of comedy and its relationship with social sensitivities, examining how jokes are perceived and the intent behind them. They discuss the role of exposure and personal experience in shaping understanding and empathy, particularly concerning marginalized communities. The episode concludes with the hosts touching on personal anecdotes and their own experiences with public perception and social dynamics.