Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
"I think that we all agree that veterinarians are bullshit" — Akash (Expresses a strong, contrarian opinion on a common profession.)
"It's not slutty enough. She just only says it's not slutty enough She won't be in what in what other time that summer not spring not winter Yeah, not fucking spring break none of that shit is somebody say oh, I can't get that it's not slutty enough" — Andrew (Discusses societal perceptions of clothing choices and the "slutty" aesthetic, particularly in relation to seasons.)
"Why don't you marry a white girl? They could spell now We see a time for bro. Why bitches are you spellin bro? They fuck with pumpkin that's a spice" — Akash (Connects cultural perceptions and traditions with seasonal preferences.)
The hosts dive into a series of "flagrant thots," beginning with a strong, contrarian stance on veterinarians, questioning their necessity and suggesting a perceived lack of specialization. This leads to a discussion on the intelligence of animals, particularly dogs, and the various roles they play, including bomb detection, with a comparison drawn to human veterans. The conversation then pivots to the complexities of language, focusing on the tonal nature of some Asian languages and the perceived difficulty in mastering them, juxtaposed with discussions about cultural representation in spelling competitions.
The episode further explores societal perceptions of personal choices and affiliations, including the idea of embracing certain seasonal trends like pumpkin spice. This leads to a humorous yet pointed discussion about dating preferences, cultural stereotypes, and the concept of attraction. The hosts also touch upon the often-inflated costs and perceived inauthenticity of wedding planning, contrasting it with the availability of modern technology like smartphones for capturing memories. The conversation circles back to provocative statements about societal behaviors and personal preferences, often using hyperbole and shock value to stimulate discussion.
Throughout the episode, the hosts express a wide range of opinions, frequently challenging conventional wisdom and engaging in lighthearted but pointed banter. The discussions are characterized by a willingness to explore taboo subjects and express unfiltered thoughts, aiming to provoke thought and amusement among their audience.