Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh
"I think they might be setting a precedent to be like, yo, if you loot, this is what could happen to you. We're going to like come through with the boys. We're going to fuck your whole shit up." — Speaker (Unnamed)
"When our kids will grow up and they will view garnering interest as a skill in of itself, right? We never looked at garnering interest as a skill back in the day because the interest was already decided." — Speaker (Unnamed)
"So instead of going like, you know, Jay Electronica is the truth. He's the great blah, blah. We're going to be like, well, he can't get anybody to be interested in him. Why?" — Speaker (Unnamed)
The podcast clip begins with a discussion about the FBI raid on Jake Paul's home, with speculation that the action might be a preemptive measure to deter future looting or unrest, particularly in the context of potential election outcomes. The speakers analyze the motivations behind such federal involvement, suggesting it could be a way to set a precedent and send a message about consequences for illegal activities, especially when targeting a public figure perceived as "hateable." The conversation then broadens to explore the evolving nature of fame, distinguishing between traditional skills and the modern ability to "garner interest" or "create cloud."
The discussion delves into how figures like Jake Paul and Logan Paul leverage their online presence, with the idea that their ability to attract attention is a skill in itself, a concept that may be more appreciated by younger generations. This is contrasted with older viewpoints that prioritize more traditional talents. The speakers debate whether this emphasis on attention is a valid skill or a sign of declining cultural standards, touching on the public's perception of "fame without skill." The analogy of David Beckham is used to illustrate how exceptional talent can be overshadowed by celebrity status, leading to a different kind of public reception.
Later, a personal anecdote is shared about an attempt to intern for the Ellen DeGeneres Show and the alleged inappropriate behavior of an executive producer named Kevin Lehman. This section is framed around the concept of being "unrapeable" and explores feelings of rejection and the curiosity surrounding why an individual might be perceived as undesirable in such a context. The conversation touches upon the power dynamics involved and the broader societal implications of allegations of sexual misconduct within the entertainment industry.